UTILIZING RECIPROCAL TEACHING STRATEGY TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION

Tri Saswandi

Sari


This research aimed to find out the extent to which Reciprocal Teaching Strategy can improve students’ reading comprehension and some factors which influence students’ improvement. This research used a Classroom Action Research by implementing two cycles which consisted of four stages (planning, action, observation, and reflection) in each cycle. The participants of this research were from the second year students of English Department of STKIP Muhammadiyah Sungai Penuh in academic year 2016/2017. The result showed that Reciprocal Teaching Strategy had improved students’ achievement in each cycle. It was found that in pre-test the students got 55 of mean score in getting main idea, 58 in detailed information, 60 in vocabulary and 54 in summary. The data showed that there were significant improvements in cycle II (mean score of main idea was 87, detailed information was 86, vocabulary was 96, and summary was 87). The factors that influenced students’ improvement are it encouraged students’ motivation, helps students in applying reading strategies, and assists students to do cooperative learning.

 

Keywords: Reciprocal Teaching, Reading, Reading Comprehension


Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


Brown. H. D. 2001. Teaching by Principles: An Integrative Approach to Language Pedagogy. Second Edition. New York: Longman inc.

Brown & Palinscar, 1989. Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glases (pp. 393-451). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Choo, Eng & Ahmad. 2011. Effect of Reciprocal Teaching Strategies on Reading Comprehension. The Reading Matrix, Vol. 11, No.2, 141-142.

Harmer, J. 1998. How to Teach English: An Introduction to the Practice of English Language Teaching. London: Longman.

________. 2007. How to Teach English. London: Longman.

Johnson, A. P. 2005. A short guide to action research. Boston : Pearson.

Kemmis, S and Mc Taggart, R. 2000. Participatory action research. In N. Denzin & Y.Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 567-605). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Mendonce. Shiny. 2012. Role of Proper English Pronunciation in Projecting a Better Personality. Retrieved on March 7, 2016, from http://msseiberlingfcms.weebly.com/reading-logs.html.

Nunan, D. 2003. Practical English Language Teaching. New York: McGraw Hill Companies

Oczkus, L. 2003. Reciprocal Teaching at work: Strategies for improving reading comprehension. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

Omari, H. A. and Weshah, H. A. 2010. Using the Reciprocal Teaching Method by Teachers at Jordanian Schools. European Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 15, No.1.

Palincsar, 1986. The role of dialogue in providing scaffolded instruction. Educational Psychologist, 21, 73-98.

Palincsar & Brown, 1984. Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 117-175.

Rivers, W. M and Temperly, M. S.1978. A practical guide to the teaching of English as a second or foreign language. London: Oxford University Press.

Smith. B. 1997. Through Writing to Reading. London: Routledge.

Utami, D. P. 2013. Using Reciprocal Teaching to Improve the Reading Comprehension of Grade VIII students of SMP N 13 Yogyakarta. Unpublished Thesis. Yogyakarta: UNY.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33559/mi.v12i80.632

Article Metrics

Sari view : 224 times
PDF - 132 times

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


##submission.copyrightStatement##

INDEXED BY :

 


Lembaga Penelitian & Pengabdian Masyarakat (LPPM). Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Barat
Jl. Pasir Kandang No.4, Pasie Nan Tigo, Kec. Koto Tangah, Kota Padang, Sumatera Barat 25586. 
Email : lppmumsb@gmail.com



Kunjungan Sampai Saat ini    Web
Analytics Made Easy - StatCounter

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.