PENDUGAAN NILAI EKONOMI POHON DALAM MENGHEMAT ENERGI LISTRIK PADA PERUMAHAN

Noril Milantara, Bambang Sulistyantara, Aris Munandar

Sari


Residential areas tend to have warmer temperatures than the vegetated areas. Trees around the building are able to cool down the ambient temperature, reduce the electric demand from air conditioning use, and help reduce the emissions of fossil fuel power plants in the atmosphere. The purpose of this study was to calculate the economic value of trees benefits in electrical energy use within residential area, to analyze the value of carbon storage in trees, and to predict the ten-year economic benefit. The research was conducted using spatial approach through CITYgreen®.The result showed that classical residential has 8,5% trees canopy over 39,25 Ha of total analysis. The total economic value gained in one area was 43.6 million rupiah, or Rp.76,918/house (2.3%). New residential has 6% canopy over 71.97 Ha, and provide total savings of 90 million rupiah, or Rp.29,571/house (0.88%). Predictions for the next ten years showed the expansion of the canopy. Canopy in classicl residential expanded to 8.67% but the economic benefits were reduced to 36 million rupiah or Rp.63,610/house (1.9%). Meanwhile, canopy in new residential reach 7% with the benefits gained increased to 106 million rupiah, or Rp.35,076/house (1.05%). The economic benefits provided by trees are depended on its distance, location, and the size of the canopy.
Keywords: landscape analysis, residential landscape, energy conservation, economic value, CITYgreen®

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


Akbari H, Kurn DM, Bretz SE, Hanford JW. 1997. Peak Power and Cooling Energy Savings of Shade Trees. Energy Buildings 25: 139-148.

American Forest. 2002. CITYgreen 5.0: Manual. Washington DC: American Forests.

[ASLA Foundation] American Society of Landscape Architects Foundation. 1977. Landscape Planning For Energy Conservation. Virginia: Environmental Design Pr.

Boulder Water Conservation. 2002. Calculating the Value of Boulder’s Urban Forest. Boulder: Boulder Water Conservation Office.

[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik. 2009. Statistik Listrik PLN 2004-2008. Jakarta: BPS.

Brown RD, Gillespie TJ. 1995. Microclimatic Landscape Design: Creating Thermal Comfort and Energy Efficiency. New York: J Willey.

Carpenter PL, Walker TD, Lanphear FO. 1975. Plant in the Landscape. San Fransisco: W.H. Freeman.

Carver AD, Unger DR, Parks CL. 2004. Modeling Energy Savings from Urban Shade Trees: An Assessment of the CITYgreen Energy Conservation Module. J Enviro Manage 34 (5): 650 – 655.

Donovan GH, Butry DT. 2009. The Value of Shade: Estimating The Effect of Urban Trees on Summertime Electricity Use. Energy Buildings 41: 662-668.

Jim CY, Chen WY. 2009. Ecosystem Services and Valuation of Urban Forests in China. Cities 26 (2009): 187–194.

Laurie M. 1990. Pengantar Kepada Arsitektur Pertamanan. Bandung: Intermatra

Lorenzo AB, Wtson J, Wims D, Muchovej JJ. 2004. A Refereed Paper: Organizing Plant Materials in Residential Landscapes Using CITYgreen®. Florida: Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 117: 291 – 296.

Longcore T, Li C, Wilson JP. 2004. Applicability of CITYgreen Urban Ecosystem Analysis Softwareto A Densely Built Urban Neighborhood. Urban Geography, 2004, 25, 2, pp. 173–186.

McPherson EG, Simpson JR. 1999. Carbon Dioxide Rreduction Through Urban Forestry: Guidelines for Professional and Volunteer Tree Planters. California: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.

McPherson EG. 1993. Energy Conservation Potential of Urban Tree Planting. J Arbor 19(6): 321-331.

McPherson EG. 1994. Using Urban Forests for Energy Efficiency and Carbon Storage. J For 92: 36-45.

Nowak DJ 1994. Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Reduction by Chicago’s Urban Forest. Di dalam: McPherson EG, Nowak DJ, Rowntree RA, editor. Chicago’s Urban Forest Ecosystem: Result of the Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project. Pennsylvania: USDA, Forest Service: 83 – 94.

Nowak DJ, Stevens JC, Sisinni SM, Luley CJ. 2002. Effects of Urban Tree Management and Species Selection on Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide. J Arbor 28 (3): 113-122.

Nowak DJ. 1993. Atmospheric Carbon Reduction by Urban Trees. J Environ Manage 37: 207-217.

Peng L, Chen S, Liu Y, Wang J. 2008. Application of CITYgreen Model in Benefit Assessment of Nanjing Urban Greenspace in Carbon Fixation and Run Off Reduction. Front. For. China 3 (2): 177–182

Solecki WD, Rosenzweig C, Parshall L, Pope G, Clark M, Cox J, Wiencke M. 2005. Mitigation of the Heat Island Effect in Urban New Jersey. Environ Hazards 6: 39-49.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31869/mi.v14i1.1867

Article Metrics

Sari view : 269 times
PDF - 243 times

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


##submission.copyrightStatement##

INDEXED BY :

 


Lembaga Penelitian & Pengabdian Masyarakat (LPPM). Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Barat
Jl. Pasir Kandang No.4, Pasie Nan Tigo, Kec. Koto Tangah, Kota Padang, Sumatera Barat 25586. 
Email : lppmumsb@gmail.com



Kunjungan Sampai Saat ini    Web
Analytics Made Easy - StatCounter

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.