PEMBUATAN SEMEN INSTAN GEOPOLIMER BERBASIS FLY ASH DENGAN SODIUM SILIKAT DARI PASIR SILIKA

M. Aditia M. Aditia, Firdaus Firdaus

Sari


The global construction industry faces major challenges related to sustainability and environmental impact, particularly from the use of conventional Portland cement, which emits approximately 0.8 tons of CO₂ per ton of cement produced. As an environmentally friendly alternative, geopolymers have emerged as inorganic polymeric materials formed through the reaction of aluminosilicates with alkaline activators, offering the advantage of utilizing industrial by-products such as fly ash. Fly ash, which is rich in silica (SiO₂) and alumina (Al₂O₃), has been proven to produce materials with high compressive strength, chemical resistance, and excellent thermal stability. However, geopolymerization requires sodium silicate (Na₂SiO₃), which is often costly and dependent on imports in developing countries. The local synthesis of sodium silicate from silica sand is therefore an essential solution, as previous studies have shown comparable effectiveness to commercial sodium silicate. Moreover, the development of instant geopolymer cement in the form of ready-to-use dry powder offers greater efficiency, longer shelf life, and ease of distribution. Based on these considerations, this research was conducted under the title “Development of Instant Geopolymer Cement Based on Fly Ash with Sodium Silicate from Silica Sand” to explore the potential of an environmentally friendly and practical construction material innovation.

Keywords: Geopolymer Cement, Fly Ash, Sodium Silicate, Silica Sand, Sustainable Construction

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


IEA (International Energy Agency). (2023). Cement. IEA, Paris https://www.iea.org/energy-system/industry/cement

Global Cement and Concrete Association (GCCA). (2023). Our Roadmap to Net Zero Concrete. https://gccassociation.org/concretefuture/

Provis, J. L. (2018). Alkali-activated materials. Cement and Concrete Research, 114, 40-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.02.009

Singh, N. B., & Middendorf, B. (2020). Geopolymers as an alternative to Portland cement: An overview. Construction and Building Materials, 237, 117455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117455

Turner, L. K., & Collins, F. G. (2013). Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e) emissions: A comparison between geopolymer and OPC cement concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 43, 125-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.023

Zhang, P., Zheng, Y., Wang, K., & Zhang, J. (2021). A review on properties of fresh and hardened geopolymer mortar. Composites Part B: Engineering, 215, 108854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108854

Thomas, J., & Thaarrini, J. (2022). A comparative review on fly ash-based geopolymer concrete and conventional concrete. Materials Today: Proceedings, 60, 554-559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.290

Dhandapani, Y., & Santhanam, M. (2020). Investigation on the changes in composition and morphology of fly ash due to grinding and its effect on the early age strength of geopolymer mortar. Construction and Building Materials, 263, 120655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120655

Almutairi, A. L., Tayeh, B. A., Adesina, A., Isleem, H. F., & Zeyad, A. M. (2021). Potential applications of geopolymer concrete in construction: A review. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 15, e00733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00733

Tchakouté, H. K., & Rüscher, C. H. (2021). The cost of geopolymer precursors: A systematic review. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 2, 100077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2021.100077

Firdaus, M. L., Elvia, R., & Alwi, W. (2022). Synthesis of sodium silicate from rice husk ash and silica sand as an activator for geopolymer production. Journal of the Korean Ceramic Society, 59(1), 108-118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43207-021-00167-9

Nurruddin, M. F., et al. (2021). Performance of geopolymer concrete activated by sodium silicate synthesized from rice husk ash and silica fume. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 15, e00606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00606

Nematollahi, B., et al. (2019). Application of geopolymer precast concrete in construction: A review. Structures, 20, 213-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2019.03.002

Panda, B., & Tan, M. J. (2021). Rheological behavior of high-volume fly ash geopolymer concrete for 3D printing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 307, 127213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127213




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31869/rtj.v9i2.7904

Article Metrics

Sari view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


##submission.copyrightStatement##

"Web Kunjungan Saat ini

Kunjungan Dari Negara

 Flag Counter

 

 

Creative Commons License
Rang Teknik Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.