Peer Review Process

Otentik law journal implements a maintenance/ review policy process as follows:

  1. The manuscript sent by the author will go through a review process by the editor, especially checking the validity of the manuscript within the scope of the journal and conformity with the Journal template. In this process, the editor will establish communication with the author so that the manuscript is worthy of being sent to reviewers or even directors/declines.
  2. Manuscripts that have passed step 1 above are sent to reviewers to review their content.
  3. The reporting process will consider novelty, objectivity, methods, scientific impact, conclusions, and references.
  4. Reviewers will suggest improvements and/or accept/ reject articles.
  5. The editor will decide by considering the suggestions from the reviewers whether the manuscript meets the requirements of the Umat Research and Development journal.
  6. The editor's decision is final.