PULMONARY EMBOLISM MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES IN DIAGNOSTIC AND TREATMENT OF 81 YEAR OLD MAN IN THE SETTING OF RURAL AREA WITH LIMITED RESOURCES : A CASE REPORT

Sidhi Laksono, Abigail Siagian

Sari


Background: Pulmonary embolism is a cardiology emergency with a high mortality rate that is hard to diagnose for its symptoms. The adequate diagnosis of pulmonary embolism requires advanced laboratory and imaging facilities which are not widely available in Indonesia. The lack of facilities and pharmacological availability is an important problem for the delay of treatment and diagnosis of pulmonary embolism will increase the mortality number. This case reports on a patient with pulmonary embolism, managed in a limited healthcare facility. Case Illustration: A-81-year-old Man came with sudden dyspnea and hemoptoe. Physical examination showed mild tachycardia, a drop of blood saturation, and signs of right heart failure. His ECG showed deep S wave in lead I, Q wave in lead III (McGinn-white sign), P pulmonary in lead II, III, aVF, inverted T in inferior and anterior lead. Diagnosis were determined by the clinical score and the ECG pattern. The patient showed hemodynamic instability and was included as a high-risk pulmonary embolism, therefore systemic thrombolysis should be the goal therapy for this patient. Due to the unavailability of systemic thrombolysis, systemic anticoagulant therapy using fondaparinux sodium was initiated and hemodynamic support was given. The patient developed refractory shock despite the usage of the hemodynamic support and died after 5 days of hospitalization. Conclusion: The limitation of diagnostic tools and therapy is one of the biggest challenges in rural hospitals for it can increase the mortality rate of PE Patients. The procurement of diagnostic modalities and pharmacology therapies should be carried out in all hospitals in Indonesia to provide the best management for the patient.


Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


Barco, S. et al. 2018. Differential impact of syncope on the prognosis of patients with acute pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Heart Journal 39(47), pp. 4186–4195. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy631.

Barco, S. et al. 2021. Global reporting of pulmonary embolism–related deaths in the World Health Organization mortality database: Vital registration data from 123 countries. Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis 5(5), p. e12520. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12520.

Barnes, G.D. et al. 2020. Comparison of 4 Acute Pulmonary Embolism Mortality Risk Scores in Patients Evaluated by Pulmonary Embolism Response Teams. JAMA Network Open 3(8), p. e2010779. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.10779.

Bĕlohlávek, J., Dytrych, V. and Linhart, A. 2013. Pulmonary embolism, part I: Epidemiology, risk factors and risk stratification, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis and nonthrombotic pulmonary embolism. Experimental and clinical cardiology 18(2), pp. 129–38.

Dalen, J.E. 2002. Pulmonary embolism: what have we learned since Virchow? Natural history, pathophysiology, and diagnosis. Chest 122, pp. 1440–1456.

Duffett, L., Castellucci, L.A. and Forgie, M.A. 2020. Pulmonary embolism: update on management and controversies. BMJ, p. m2177. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2177.

Konstantinides, S. V et al. 2020. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS). European Heart Journal 41(4), pp. 543–603. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz405.

Laurentius, A. and Ariani, R. 2023. Diagnostic comparison of anterior leads T-wave inversion and McGinn-White sign in suspected acute pulmonary embolism: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine 30(1), pp. 54–60. doi: 10.1177/1024907920966520.

Leidi, A., Bex, S., Righini, M., Berner, A., Grosgurin, O. and Marti, C. 2022. Risk Stratification in Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Current Evidence and Perspectives. Journal of Clinical Medicine 11(9), p. 2533. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092533.

LeVarge, B.L., Wright, C.D. and Rodriguez-Lopez, J.M. 2018. Surgical Management of Acute and Chronic Pulmonary Embolism. Clinics in Chest Medicine 39(3), pp. 659–667. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2018.04.017.

Ma, X., Ferguson, E.C., Jiang, X., Savitz, S.I. and Shams, S. 2022. A multitask deep learning approach for pulmonary embolism detection and identification. Scientific Reports 12(1), p. 13087. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16976-9.

McLendon, K., Goyal, A. and Attia, M. 2023. Deep Venous Thrombosis Risk Factors. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing.

Medson, K., Yu, J., Liwenborg, L., Lindholm, P. and Westerlund, E. 2022. Comparing ‘clinical hunch’ against clinical decision support systems (PERC rule, wells score, revised Geneva score and YEARS criteria) in the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism. BMC Pulmonary Medicine 22(1), p. 432. doi: 10.1186/s12890-022-02242-1.

Moore, A.J.E., Wachsmann, J., Chamarthy, M.R., Panjikaran, L., Tanabe, Y. and Rajiah, P. 2018. Imaging of acute pulmonary embolism: an update. Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy 8(3), pp. 225–243. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2017.12.01.

Pietrasik, A. et al. 2022. Catheter-Based Therapies Decrease Mortality in Patients With Intermediate and High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: Evidence From Meta-Analysis of 65,589 Patients. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine 9. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.861307.

Purwowiyoto, S. L., M, F., R, Y., Halomoan, R. ., & Kurniawan. (2021). PULMONARY EMBOLISM WITH ANTIPHOSPHOLIPID SYNDROME: A CASE REPORT. Sanus Medical Journal, 2(2), 9–13. doi: 10.22236/sanus.v2i2.7256

Robert‐Ebadi, H. et al. 2017. Assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism: prospective validation of the simplified Geneva score. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 15(9), pp. 1764–1769. doi: 10.1111/jth.13770.

Sidhi L, Firizkita D, Reynaldo H. 2021. Pulmonary Embolism in High-Risk Patients: How to Select Standard Imaging and Management Strategy? IJIHS 9(1), pp. 30-35. doi: 10.15850/ijihs.v9n1.2142

Stals, M., Kaptein, F., Kroft, L., Klok, F. and Huisman, M. 2021. Challenges in the diagnostic approach of suspected pulmonary embolism in COVID-19 patients. Postgraduate Medicine 133(sup1), pp. 36–41. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2021.1920723.

Thomson, D., Kourounis, G., Trenear, R., Messow, C.-M., Hrobar, P., Mackay, A. and Isles, C. 2019. ECG in suspected pulmonary embolism. Postgraduate Medical Journal 95(1119), pp. 12–17. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2018-136178.

Turetz, M., Sideris, A., Friedman, O., Triphathi, N. and Horowitz, J. 2018. Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Natural History of Pulmonary Embolism. Seminars in Interventional Radiology 35(02), pp. 92–98. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1642036.

Zantonelli, G. et al. 2022. Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Prognostic Role of Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA). Tomography 8(1), pp. 529–539. doi: 10.3390/tomography8010042.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31869/mm.v6i2.5145

Article Metrics

Sari view : 136 times
PDF - 54 times

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


 Kunjungan Saat ini

Kunjungan Dari Negara

 Flag Counter

 

 

Creative Commons License
Menara Medika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.