Judicial Review “Satu Atap” Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Bawah Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi

Wendra Yunaldi

Sari


The constitutional dual judicial review of the Constitutional Court and the regulation in the Supreme Court has created legal uncertainty in the legal system of Indonesia. The application of graded judicial review has a negative impact on the guarantee of the constitutional rights of the community. The hierarchical model of the prevailing law-enforcement regulation is the abandonment of the legal norms of the constitution in every level of legal product downward. Disconnection of constitutional norms only up to the level of the Act will be a denial of the rights of the people of Indonesia at all levels of statutory legislation under the law. As a rule of law, legal products have a value of truth and justice that refers to the source of the main legal order, namely the Constitution, so that Indonesia's constitutionalism can be tiered up and down down. Thus, there is no differentiation of the "legal certainty" between the 1945 Constitution and the KMPR, as well as the Act as an implementation product with various derivatives such as the Perpu, PP, Perpres, Provincial Regulations and Regency / City Regulations. The general nature of the constitutional arrangements becomes the standard of truth so that every act of government can be controlled and evaluated by the constitution. This situation is different from what is happening now, where the justice of regulation embodied by the Supreme Court is often biased toward the interests of "securing" the contents of the regulation rather than granting legal justice rights, not to mention the long waiting periods of unclear ends. MA finally failed to bring about legal justice for the community. This is where judicial review or judicial constitutional should be placed on the shoulders of the Constitutional Court so that the conception of the Indonesian legal state not only applies only at the national level, but also becomes a backbone for the community in each region through the granting of the right of the people to obtain justice through the examination of legal products that harm the constitutional rights community.

Kata Kunci


Judicial Review; Legislation; Authority MK

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


Buku:

Deliar Noer. (1997). Pemikiran Politik di Dunia Barat. Bandung: Pustaka Mizan.

Feri Amsari. (tt.). Perubahan UUD 1945: Perubahan Konstitusi Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia Melalui Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Frans Magnis Suseno. (1999). Kuasa dan Moral. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Garner, Bryan A. (2004). Black’s Law Dictionary. Eighth Edition, United States of America: a Thomson Business

I Dewa Gede Palguna. (2013). Pengaduan Konstitusional (constitutional complaint). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

J.H. Rapar TH. (1993). Filsafat Politik Aristoteles. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Jimly Asshiddiqie. (2004). Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi-Pusat Studi HTN UI.

______. (2005). Model-Model Pengujian Konstitusional di Berbagai Negara. Jakarta: Konpress.

______. (2005). “Mahkamah Konstitusi : Fenomena Hukum tata Negara Abad ke-20”, Makalah, Firmansyah Arifin, (ed), Hukum dan Kuasa Konstitusi. Jakarta: KRHN.

Hans Kelsen. (1961). General Theory of Law and State. New York: Russell & Russell.

Leonard W. Levy (ed.). (2005) Judicial Review: Sejarah Kelahiran, Wewenang, dan Fungsinya dalam Negara Demokrasi, Judul Asli: Judicial Review and the Supreme Court, Pen. Eni Purwaningsih. Jakarta: Nuansa.

M. Mahfud MD. (2009). Konstitusi dan Hukum dalam Kontroversi Isu. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

______. (2000). Demokrasi dan Konstitusi di Indonesia, Studi tentang Interaksi Politik dan Kehidupan Ketatanegaraan. cet, ke-2. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

______. (tt). Membangun Politik Hukum, Menegakkan Konstitusi. Jakarta: LP3ES

______. (2007). Perdebatan Hukum Tata Negara Pasca Amandemen Konstitusi. Jakarta: LP3ES.

______. (2007). Perdebatan Hukum Tata Negara; Pasca Amandemen Konstitusi. Jakarta: LP3ES.

MPR RI. Buku II Jilid 3, Risalah Rapat ke-1 Badan Pekerja MPR RI, 1999. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal MPR RI.

Muhammad Yamin. (tt.). Naskah Persiapan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945, 1959, Jilid I. Jakarta: Yayasan Prapanca.

Ridwan HR. (2013). Hukum Administrasi Negara, Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: PT. RajaGravindo Persada.

Sri Soemantri. (1986). Hak Menguji Material di Indonesia. Bandung: Alumni.

Jurnal:

Maruarar Siahaan. (2010). “Uji Konstitusionalitas Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Negara Kita : Masalah dan Tantangan”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 7 Nomor 4.

Undang-Undang:

UU No. 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukkan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.

Internet:

http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/MarburyvsMadison.mht,diakses tanggal 1 Januari 2018

Kompas.com, 5 Februari 2016, diakses 1 Januari 2018


Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


PLJ Statistics