Penggunaan Diskresi dalam Penegakan Hukum oleh Kepolisian menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia

Roberts K

Sari


The important role of the National Police as a law enforcer is very necessary. However, in meetings in the field, the police are faced with a decision in which he must choose an action taken outside the limits of his authority and outside the command of his leader. At certain times, a police officer must make the right decision or better known as "discretion". A quick and precise decision is of course motivated by consideration and assistance with accountability. The implementation was relatively more important than the police officer recommended, but even so the background of the users must be of greater and wider interest (public interest).

Kata Kunci


Discretion; Law enforcement; Police

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


Anthon F. Susanto. (2004). Wajah Peradilan Kita, Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Darji Darmodiharjo, dan Shidarta. (1995). Pokok-pokok Filsafat Hukum apa dan bagaimana filsafat hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Ikrar Mandiri abadi.

Kountjoro Purbopranoto. (1981). Beberapa Catatan Hukum Tata Pemerintahan Dan Peradilan Aministrasi. Bandung: Alumni.

Mabes POLRI. (2002). Buku Pedoman Pelaksanaan Tugas Bintara POLRI Di Lapangan. Jakarta: Undang-undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002.

Sadjijono. (2010). Memahami Hukum Kepolisian. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Lansbang PressSindo

Warsito Hadi Utomo. (2005). Hukum Kepolisian Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka.

Muladi. (1995). Merenungi Kritik Terhadap Polri Buku II. Jakarta: Cipta Manunggal.

Soerjono Soekanto. (1986). Faktor-Faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hokum. Jakarta: Rajawali.

P.A.F. Lamintang. (1990). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Bandung: Sinar baru.


Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


PLJ Statistics