COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION OF CERVICAL CANCER RISK QUESTIONNAIRES: ANALYZING DEMOGRAPHIC, BEHAVIORAL, ENVIRONMENTAL DIMENSIONS
Sari
Background: Cervical cancer is highly preventable and treatable if detected early; however, many women still face serious consequences due to this cancer. Late screening is one of the primary risk factors contributing to the incidence of cervical cancer. Problem: Many studies that use questionnaires to assess cervical cancer risk factors often lack a thorough evaluation of the instruments' validity, reliability, and appropriateness, underscoring the need for comprehensive assessment. Objective: This study aims to evaluate questionnaires related to cervical cancer risk factors by assessing their validity, reliability, and suitability. Method: A systematic review was conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, analyzing studies published from 2014 to 2024. Nine papers were reviewed, focusing on questionnaire characteristics, including the number of items, item types, and validity assessment methods. Results: The analysis showed that 56% of the studies used questionnaires with fewer than 50 items, and all studies used closed-item formats. In 44% of the studies, the number of items was not disclosed. The highest percentage of studies (44%) involved using questionnaires adapted from previous research. Regarding validity, 44% of the studies employed Cronbach's alpha as a measure. Conclusion: Questionnaires used in studies on cervical cancer risk factors exhibit variation in characteristics and validity assessment methods. To improve questionnaire quality, it is crucial to ensure clear disclosure of item counts and robust validity and reliability assessments.
Teks Lengkap:
PDF (English)Referensi
Andrade, C. (2020). Learning Curve Sample Size and its Importance in Research. 2019–2020. https://doi.org/10.4103/IJPSYM.IJPSYM
Chandana, H., Madhu, B., & Murthy, M. R. N. (2020). Awareness about cervical cancer among women residing in urban slums of Mysuru city of Karnataka , India : A cross-sectional study. 8(September 2019), 835–839.
Dabaghi, S., Esmaielzadeh, F., & Rohani, C. (2020). Application of Rasch Analysis for Development and Psychometric Properties of Adolescents ’ Quality of Life Instruments : A Systematic Review Application of Rasch Analysis for Development and Psychometric Properties of Adolescents ’ Quality of Life Instrum. https://doi.org/10.2147/AHMT.S265413
Desai, S. C. (2019). Comparing the use of open and closed questions for Web-based measures of the continued-influence effect. 1426–1440.
Dozie, U. W., Ezeala, O. V., David, C. I., Dozie, K. C. N., Chukwuocha, U. M., Iwuala, C. C., Osuoji, N. J., Okoro, C. C., Chukwu, O. R., Eneh, S. C., & Dozie, I. N. S. (2023). Factors associated with health seeking delay in the screening of cervical cancer among women in Imo state, south Eastern Nigeria. Cancer Treatment and Research Communications, 37(September). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctarc.2023.100765
Fitzpatrick, M., Pathipati, M. P., McCarty, K., Rosenthal, A., Katzenstein, D., Chirenje, Z. M., & Pinsky, B. (2020). Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of cervical Cancer screening among HIV-positive and HIV-negative women participating in human papillomavirus screening in rural Zimbabwe. BMC Women’s Health, 20(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-020-01017-2
George T, J. (2021). Factors influencing utilization of cervical cancer screening services among women – A cross sectional survey. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health, 11(April), 100752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2021.100752
Hadler, P. (2023). The Effects of Open-Ended Probes on Closed Survey Questions in Web Surveys. 4–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241231176846
Hawkins, M., Elsworth, G. R., & Osborne, R. H. (2019). Questionnaire validation practice : a protocol for a systematic descriptive literature review of health literacy assessments. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030753
Hughes, J. L., Camden, A. A., Yangchen, T., Smith, G. P. A., Domenech Rodríguez, M. M., Rouse, S. V., McDonald, C. P., & Lopez, S. (2022). INVITED EDITORIAL: Guidance for Researchers When Using Inclusive Demographic Questions for Surveys: Improved and Updated Questions. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 27(4), 232–255. https://doi.org/10.24839/2325-7342.jn27.4.232
Hyman, M. R., & Sierra, J. J. (2016). Open- versus close-ended survey questions. September 2015.
Jiaying, L., Mohammad, A., Keshavarzi, F., & Bheemavarapu, H. (2019). Assessment of knowledge , attitude and barriers towards cervical cancer vaccination among Malaysian women. Le Pharmacien Hospitalier et Clinicien, 54(3), 279–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phclin.2018.12.001
Krishnappa, P., Piddennavar, R., & Mohan, M. (2011). Art and Science of Questionnaire Development Art and Science of Questionnaire Development. January 2017, 3–8.
Linacre, J. M. (2024). Sample Size and Item Calibration [ or Person Measure ] Stability. July.
Mago, H. C., Kok, T., & Santosa, W. N. (2022). Profil Faktor Risiko Dan Sosiodemografis Kanker Serviks : Sebuah Kajian Sistematis. 3(June).
Memon, M. A., Ting, H., & Cheah, J. (2020). Sample Size for Survey Research : Review and Recommendations Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling SAMPLE SIZE FOR SURVEY RESEARCH : REVIEW AND. 4(June). https://doi.org/10.47263/JASEM.4(2)01
Mwalwanda, A., Chavura, E., Chisale, M. R. O., & Chingatichifwe, B. (2024). Cervical cancer screening among female health workers : Evidence from a secondary health facility in Northern Malawi. 37(December 2023).
Nimani, T. D., Bayisa, F. S., Jimma, S. D., & Assefa, A. T. (2024). Knowledge and attitude toward cervical cancer screening among women aged 30–49 years attending selected health facilities in Ethiopia: Using structural equation model. Heliyon, 10(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31596
Nwabichie, C. C., Manaf, R. A., & Ismail, S. B. (2018). Factors affecting uptake of cervical cancer screening among African Women in Klang Valley, Malaysia. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 19(3), 825–831. https://doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.3.825
Peirson, L., Fitzpatrick-lewis, D., Ciliska, D., & Warren, R. (2013). Screening for cervical cancer : a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Qureshi, S. A., Gele, A., Kour, P., Møen, K. A., Kumar, B., & Diaz, E. (2019). A community-based intervention to increase participation in cervical cancer screening among immigrants in Norway. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0795-8
Ranganathan, P., & Caduff, C. (2023). Designing and validating a research questionnaire ‑ Part 1. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.picr
Rodrigues, S. B., Sheilini, M., & Nayak, R. (2024). Awareness, risk for cervical cancer and readiness for Papanicolaou (Pap) testing among female housekeeping staff in a tertiary care hospital Karnataka-A quantitative approach. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health, 25(January), 101503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2023.101503
Roopa, S. (2012). Questionnaire Designing for a Survey 1. 46(December), 273–277.
Serdar, C. C., Cihan, M., & Serdar, M. A. (2021). Sample size, power and effect size revisited: simplified and practical approaches in pre-clinical, clinical and laboratory studies. 31(1), 1–27.
Taherdoost, H. (2022). Designing a Questionnaire for a Research Paper : A Comprehensive Guide to Design and Develop an Effective Questionnaire Designing a Questionnaire for a Research Paper : A Comprehensive Guide to Design and Develop an Effective Questionnaire. April. https://doi.org/10.51983/ajms-2022.11.1.3087
Toor. (2020). Demographic survey questions that yield valuable insights. https://www.qualtrics.com/blog/demographic-survey-questions/
Watkins, M. W. (2018). Exploratory Factor Analysis : A Guide to Best Practice. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798418771807
Zhang, Y., & Aryadoust, V. (2022). education sciences Second Language Research.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31869/mm.v7i1.5928
Article Metrics
Sari view : 0 timesPDF (English) - 0 times
Refbacks
- Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.
Kunjungan Saat ini
Kunjungan Dari Negara
Menara Medika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.